Screen
Substation headroom, queue position risk and upgrade exposure for up to five candidate sites.
Interlock gets large loads connected to the grid: data centers, fabs and electrified plants. We tell you how much power a site can really get, how long it will take, and what it takes to get it sooner.
Utilities are receiving requests for more load than their transmission systems were planned to carry. Studies take longer, upgrade costs arrive late, and a site that looked ready on a map can turn out to be five years from service.
Most teams learn this after the land option is signed. Interlock’s job is to find it out first, and then change the answer where the physics and the tariffs allow.
“The utility’s first letter is an opening position. It is rarely the fastest path.”
Substation headroom, queue position risk and upgrade exposure for up to five candidate sites.
Load request strategy, study scoping, and negotiation of facilities and service agreements.
Owner’s representation through construction, commissioning and ramp schedule.
Client names withheld by design.
Most clients start with a screen. About a third of screened sites move forward, and we stay with them through energization.
A site screen is a fixed fee, credited against a Secure engagement if you proceed. Secure and Deliver work is billed on a monthly retainer tied to milestones, not hours.
We do not take success fees contingent on utility decisions. It keeps our advice honest when the right answer is to walk away from a site.
A 300 MW campus and a 40 MW fab face the same utility with very different bargaining positions. We plan around the one you actually have.
Each file shows the utility’s first answer, what we did, and where the project landed.
Short, practical writing on tariffs, studies and utility negotiation, for people who sign the checks.
A 30-page read on queue conditions, tariff changes and upgrade costs across eleven markets.
Demo form. Nothing is sent.
Our partners have run transmission planning groups, written tariffs and negotiated service agreements for developers. We know what a utility can say yes to.
A capacity letter usually reflects today’s system and today’s queue. We test it against queued load ahead of you, planned upgrades and the tariff rules that decide cost allocation, which is where most schedules slip.
With it. Utilities want load that pays for itself and does not threaten reliability. Our work is structuring requests so they can say yes faster, through phasing, flexibility commitments and funded upgrades.
Yes. Site selection teams often bring us a long list. We narrow it by power availability before anyone spends money on land or entitlements.
We work under NDA and never contact a utility about a specific site without written approval. Early screens use public data and our own models only.
Then you will know in three weeks instead of eighteen months, and the screen fee is the cheapest thing you will spend on that site.
Answer four questions for an indicative risk read. If it looks promising, send it to us for a full screen.